What frustrates me isn't liberals, left-wingers, communists, socialists,
 fascists, statists, totalitarians, collectivists, or theocrats.  These 
people, while aggravating, are nothing compared to...well, they go by 
many names.  Centrists, moderates, political agnostics, neutrals, 
*Switzerland*, and undecided voters.  During the course of this article, I
 will be giving such people the dope slap.  You've all seen the dope 
slap.  Marc Harmon on NCIS will smack his team members in the back of 
their head to indicate they're being morons.  Much dope slapping will 
occur.  
First off, there are only a few reasons that you're 
politically neutral, none of which are valid reasons to be.  They are as
 follows.  
1.  You're not and you know you're not.  You only say it to appear high-minded and above the fray.
2.
  You're liberal on some issues and conservative on others, but you 
refuse to evaluate which side represents your interests more often than 
the other, so you perpetually refuse to pick a side.   
3.  
You're apathetic because, for whatever reason, you don't believe either 
side can or will carry out the interests of your political alignment, 
and you have mistaken this apathy for an absence of ideology.  
4.
  You honestly haven't thought through any principles or ideas regarding
 politics, so you're totally lost and you know it.  All the different 
ways of saying you're politically neutral sound a lot smarter than the 
word "uninformed" and you know it.  
Having established that you 
do have a political alignment, whether you know it or not for whatever 
reason, here's how you figure out what it is.  
There are three 
spheres of American politics.  Financial issues, Hawkish/Foreign Policy 
issues, and Social Issues.  With each of these, the application is 
whether you want more individual rights/local control/freedom or more 
collective rights/federal or global control/regulation.  
Let's go through this one at a time.  
Financial:  This means taxes/land/trade and just about anything having to do with money or work.  
If
 you're fiscally conservative you want taxes as low as possible and for 
the government to provide for only the most basic needs of 
infrastructure.  To you, the private sector is better at nearly 
everything because of greater competition and accountability.  Except in
 cases of true abuses of corporate power, you want the government out of
 the business of business.  You believe where people are economically is
 temporary and that upward mobility is not only possible, but what makes
 America great, so you feel no need to spread the wealth or redress 
socioeconomic variation.  
If you're fiscally liberal, you want 
taxes as high as possible in order to pay for social services that are 
both diverse and comprehensive.  To you, government is better than the 
private sector at nearly everything because they were elected and you 
trust politicians and bureaucrats in general more than greedy evil 
businessmen.  Business should not be able to take a breath without 
government say-so, and in most cases government should control the means
 of production anyway, just to be on the safe side.  For the most part, 
you believe that the rich get richer and the poor get poorer, and you're
 stay in the caste you're born into, unless you're amazing lucky or 
cheat and steal your way to the top.  America has been particularly 
unfair to the working man, so you feel the government should make it 
more fair in America by taxing, regulating, and redistributing all the 
wealth until everybody's equal and nobody's poor, because that's the 
only fair way to do it.  
Foreign Policy/Hawkishness  
If 
you're a hawk, you want American foreign policy to be strong and 
aggressive.  We're the leader of the free world and command the most 
powerful military on the face of the Earth, and we ought to act like it 
too.  Other states around the world respond to strength, not weakness, 
so showing any in dealings of foreign policy is always ill-advised.  
Diplomacy and being nice to other nations is fine and good, but only 
when it can be done from a position of strength, so that you can 
confidently threat dire results to any nation acting against American 
interests.  When it comes to crime, you're basically in agreement with 
Harry Callahan.  Crime is completely unacceptable in civilized society 
and you're fully prepared to give the cops the tools and power they need
 to combat it by any means necessary, including putting the bad guys in 
prisons where they break big rocks into small rocks or simply executing 
them.  You don't just rely on cops to protect you though, because you 
support the right to bear arms, and you've got yours on you, along with a
 permit like a good law-abiding citizen.
If you're a dove, you 
want American foreign policy to be kind and empathic.  We're not the 
leader of the free world, but just a member state among many such 
nations.  Commanding the most powerful military on Earth is probably 
scary for the other states, and so we've got to take care to not be too 
intimidating.  Diplomacy and being nice to others comes first and 
foremost, and we should do so with states both weaker and stronger than 
us in equal measure.  Nations acting against American interests are 
probably doing so because of something we did wrong, so we need to 
understand where they're coming from.  Crime is a result of poverty and 
disenfranchisement, so we need to look at ourselves before we start 
pointing fingers at "criminals" who are really just innocent victims of a
 corrupt society and system.  The police must have a pacifistic and 
humanitarian approach to criminals, treating them no different than they
 would you or me, including prison, which must meet all standards of the
 Geneva Convention and never include the death penalty.  Guns are an 
invention of violent and unlawful men and should never be allowed for 
anyone other than the military and police.  Self-defense is a not a 
personal responsibility in a civilized society, and you are prepared to 
rely upon police officers as the sole protection for you and your 
family. 
Social:
If you're a social conservative, you 
believe that tradition and fundamentalist Christianity has it right on 
all issues concerning social policy in this country.  Marriage is 
between a man and a woman, homosexuality is an abomination, sex 
education is a menace, art and music need to be censored within an inch 
of their lives, abortion is never acceptance, and drugs of any manner 
are of the devil.  Evolution is a plot of secular progressives to 
undermine the values of this country and to turn our children against 
God.  Separation of church and state does not guarantee you freedom from
 religion, because it only guarantees that religion will remain free 
from government.  Ultimately, you believe that humanity is a sinful and 
amoral lot who need to be perfected by Jesus Christ if they are to ever 
succeed in having a sustained civilized society.  Where government 
cannot and should not help to perfect the people, religion shall.   
If
 you're a social liberal, you believe in individual liberty for every 
person regarding how they live their own life.  So long as they don't 
hurt you or anyone else that isn't a consenting adult, their behavior 
and their private lives are exactly that, their own.  Marriage is 
people's own business, homosexuality is a beautiful quality of humanity,
 sex education is vital to a better understanding of a universal aspect 
of human life and to human health, art and music need the freedom to 
breathe so they may create and inspire, abortion is a personal and 
individual decision that should come up as infrequently as possible, and
 drugs are the business of the person taking them, as long as they're 
not hurting anybody else.  Evolution is a scientific fact, insomuch as 
gravity, electromagnetism, and tectonic plates are.  Separation of 
church and state, in fact, means that nobody should be forced to 
acknowledge or participate in a faith they do not believe in, especially
 in a public institution of any kind.  Ultimately, education and science
 will rise humanity above anything we can conceive of now.  We are on an
 amazing journey as a species that, on the scale of geological time, was
 just concerned with throwing a spear as accurately as possible and 
running after our prey as fast as we can.  Questions of the origin of 
the universe, the nature of subatomic particles, and activity within 
black holes should all be beyond our primitive brains to even ask, and 
yet here we are on the brink of enlightenment that is nearly impossible 
to overstate.  Neither government nor religion shall perfect us, for we 
are on a journey quite beyond what either would conceive of as 
perfection, so wondrous is the natural world.
So, simply put, 
you're not politically agnostic.  If you're educated and reasonably 
introspective, you've already thought this through and you know what is 
true about your thoughts and what is not.  If you're not education and 
you're not introspective, I encourage you to change both aspects of 
yourself.  No undecided voters should exist in a nation with 
near-universal access to libraries, the Internet, and political pundits 
of all stripes.  So if you're really undecided, get decided, and if 
you're claiming to be neutral while doing lots of complaining about Rush
 Limbaugh and Sarah Palin, cut the crap.  Your intellectual dishonesty 
is nauseating.  
-Frank
No comments:
Post a Comment