Social conservatism got the GOP to where it is
today, that is largely out of power, bereft of a meaningful future, and
generally viewed as ignorant theocratic misogynistic douchebags. A
political party that holds to an ethos of pre-enlightenment morality,
collectivist notions of civil liberties, and callousness regarding human
suffering cannot prevail in the world of tomorrow. There is, however,
nuance in the field of abortion. While I support abortion being legal, I
find some fundamental problems with how it is popularly viewed. To that
end, I have come up with a useful analogy, which I will explain
presently.
A few centuries ago, those with debts they could not
pay ended up in debtor's prison. This was eventually concluded to be
unjust, around the time of the American Revolution, if I recall the
class I learned about this during. So the modern world still has
bankruptcy. This does not mean that bankruptcy is not to be avoided by all
means, that it is not a terrible highly personal event in the lives of
those who seek it, or that it cannot be abused, the latter occurrence of
which can and has meant regulation of it where appropriate. Similarly,
when abortion was illegal, coat hangers and back alley abortionists did
their damage, while those who got caught faced criminal correction. So
Roe V. Wade's conclusion about medical privacy, while sound in its own
right regarding medical privacy, did not actually address abortion per
se. Therefore, it must be meaningfully addressed but can only be done so
partially by legislation. Regulation of abortion is okay, just as
regulation of bankruptcy is okay, and just as regulation of firearms is
okay, despite a Constitutional Amendment. Whether Constitutional
Amendment or Supreme Court decision, these freedoms are subject to
appropriate regulation. What constitutes appropriate regulation, whether
that be partial birth abortion or student loan exemption from
bankruptcy, is always necessarily open to vigorous debate.
The final thing I think needs to change in the
thought about abortion is that it must be thought of as bankruptcy. There
is a certain shame and stigma about taking bankruptcy. It's not very
strong or anything in law, but it is rather recognized as indicating one
has screwed up. Some who enter bankruptcy cannot avoid it, and anything
without consent would be analogous in abortion. In these cases there
ought not be shame or stigma. Modern birth control technology means the
vast majority of abortions need not have occurred. Within the grasp of
modern civilization is the ability to eliminate the need for abortion
almost entirely, yet we do not see this. We do not see this because one
side is concerned with discouraging what they perceive as a moral evil
and the other doesn't see abortion as a problem to begin with. However,
morality has little to do with it and it is a problem. Let's view it as a
problem to be solved and do so with contraception, education, and
greater access to both for as many people, especially women, as
possible. When complete control of their own reproduction is within the
reach of every individual, both sides can down the signs, end the
tiresome arguments, and recognize the beauty of every child being wanted
and women everywhere, finally, being free of the demands of nature and
government.
-Frank
No comments:
Post a Comment